Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Halloween reflections

This blog was born on Halloween evening 6 years ago. I tapped into the coconut telegraph to despair at my own costume procrastination, to condemn my indecision. And the next day I tuned back in to describe the triumph of my last-minute genius. Against all odds, I'd done it.

Such has been the pattern of my achievements: inaction, despair, breakthrough. I am not one to stay on task out of some inner urge. My ambition, like my efforts, has always followed the law of eternal oscillation.

But I've progressed and triumphed apace nonetheless. Tomorrow I start a job. And at the same time I circle around to the central pillar of my Syracuse study: economics.

Naturally, there have been variations on the theme. I've dedicated the lion's share of my attention to micro-economic theory and mathematics, statistics and econometrics, and the history and philosophy of economics.

At Moody's Analytics I'll work on the questions and components of the macro-economy. How wonderful to be attending to issues of vitality, academic and practical relevance, and graspable complexity.

Becoming Associate Economist at Moody's is one of few large undertakings about which I've felt unequivocally positive. I believe it will give me structure, instill increased discipline, and encourage great growth both on and off the job.

The time is, as always, now. Happy Halloween!

Reading: Robert Skidelsky's John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed (1883-1920)
Listening: Daina Dieva, Svart1 "Incubi-Succubi"

Saturday, June 02, 2012

Vampire Weekend's Contra

The proliferation of essays on Vampire Weekend’s obscurely-titled, new album–Contra–should surprise no one. The independently released album, by XL Recordings, is now enjoying the top spot on the Billboard Album Chart.

VW is the polemical double-debutante of the indie pop scene. It has an appeal like a fruity, sugary, jolly Tootsie pop – a glossy sheen of pop prowess, and a mysterious center. How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Vampire Weekend album?

There are two ways to approach Contra: To achieve the elusive center, we can either deliver a swift and severe bite, like the peckish owl, or we can bestow lick-caresses, patiently and earnestly, while the musical dye stains our tongues.

Consideration between these two methods immerses us in an age old dialectic about musical analysis. Musicologists, academic and amateur, have long debated the merits and deficiencies of discussing just the music or, alternatively, the whole musical milieu.

Method one would be the brisk bite, and is sometimes referred to as positivist, structural, or scientific. It takes the recorded music to be a discreet artifact, and removes it from its social and cultural influences.

Method two would be the languid lick-job.This might be informed by sociology or cultural studies, and it would examine the history, cultural embeddedness, and mystique of the music and musicians. Both methods are useful, inevitable, and clearly complimentary. By combining the two, we balance the analysis and can dance around some of the common criticisms – that VW is preppy, elitist, lyrically remote, or that its combination of styles, including African soukous, represents a blithe cooptation of the authentic for commercial gain.

I restrain myself from going into too much detail here, because sophisticated and in-depth song-by-song analyses have been done elsewhere, such as this one in The New York Times. VW’s music is unapologetically poppy. By which I mean, it is mellifluous, lyrically accessible, relatively simple in structure, and chock full of memorable hooks and repetitive choruses.

While the adjectives “poppy” or “mainstream” can sometimes seem derogatory–and may be valid as such – Saul Williams expresses my opinion on the subject best: “That’s only a criticism if you’re a loyalist to the underground as opposed to a loyalist to good shit.”

Is Contra good shit? From the positivist perspective, the album is a collection of songs which are relatively simple, structurally, but that does not make it uncreative. To the contrary, the gentlemen of VW–led by singer Ezra Koenig–keep the rhythm and speed of the songs varied throughout, and the ebb and flow guarantee a strong level of titillation.

Contra’s instrumentation is lush and heterogeneous, representing the cherry-picked best of American, African, and English styles. Koenig’s vocals range from the strident to the spectral. VW also pumps up the post-production, relative to their self-titled debut. Those methods are particularly effective in opening space in their laconic songs for innovation and novelty.

For instance, the distorting, Auto-Tune effect on Koenig’s voice in “California English” is a refreshing embellishment to the brisk, purportedly Afro-pop sensibility. Also, check out the yelping skat on “Cousins,”–their first single and, ironically, one of my least favorite songs on the album – the strings and–what the hell is that?–harpsichord on “Taxi Cab,” the horns on the straight-forward pop-tune “Run,” and the African drum–djembe, I think–on the ballad, “I Think Ur A Contra.”  Then “Diplomat’s Son” is musically kaleidoscopic, and the most characteristic song as an appropriate analogy for the diversity of the album as a whole.

As we lick towards the full picture on VW’s Contra, it must be conceded that the underlying diversity of the album can be a double edge sword. It implies that, for every listener, there are to be some songs which grate or bore. “Holiday,” for instance, strikes me as sub-par in its redundancy, melody, and instrumentation. It tries for a British pop-punk sensibility, but falls flat. “Holiday,” along with “Cousins,” are the two most simplistic, poptastic, and repetitive songs on the album.VW balances on a tightrope of accessible and intriguing and can easily lose its sophistication and end up sounding sophomoric. Or, importantly, this is just the part of the album that appeals least to my sensibility. Chances are that some listeners prefer these songs and dis-prefer those I find most fresh and electrifying.

Lyrically, Contra is somewhat obscure, which can also be seen as arrogant or remote by some listeners. It is erudite on pop culture and redolent of international travel and American upper-middle-classism. One can be turned off by this, but I take it to be an opportunity for education and rich interpretation.  “California English,” for instance, is packed with references: to “Hapa Club” (Hapa refers to a person of mixed Asian or Pacific Islander ethnic heritage), “carob cake” (from a tree found only in the Mediterranean) as well as a high-flying geographic panoply, not to mention Tom’s Organic Toothpaste.

VW’s music is representative of the eclecticism of the contemporary age, what with globalization and the rise of youth-inspired cosmopolitanism. The gentlemen of VW are unbounded, like the wealthy youth of the western world (and, more and more, the youth of the world): internationally minded, cultural cherry-pickers, innovative about mixing and melding.

They channel the feeling of internationalized manifest destiny which is unique to today’s millenial generation. That they are somehow elitist and prepified is undeniable: they represent a cultural trend which is rooted in wealth and the inequality of international globalization. However, to criticize them for those external cultural aspects is to create an ad hominem, which has no bearing on the discreet artifact that is their recorded music.Those that emphasize the relevance of this fact, more often than not belong to and benefit from the same generational and cultural mold.

The fact that VW’s music is called “Upper West Side Soweto,” and derives influence from Congolese soukous is an object of interest, but more importantly, integral to the band’s commercial success. We do not care all that much what soukous is or what elements of it are in VW’s music. If we have dire fears of cultural imperialism, the hegemony of commercial capitalism, or the cooptation of the “authentic” for the sake of the “artificial,”  they are not reflected in patterns of musical consumption. We just like the music and adore the international flair, the sheen of mystery. Unlike the contra-revolutionaries of late 20th century Nicaragua, we are contra-nothing except bad taste and mediocre music.

Vampire Weekend has done a particularly good job of exploiting our (some combination of American; international; youth; upper-; middle-; class) omnivorous multiculturalism, growing apathy and agnosticism towards origin and authenticity, and our inherent privilege and prepiness, even in those who do not dress like Oxford dons.

-Note: Reprint from when I was editor and contributor at WERW 1570's student radio and music blog at Syracuse University. Contra was released January 12, 2010. My show was called Brad and The Unbounded One.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Too much text

Urge of the demi


You
And I
Are not one.
You take for granted
That I take for granted.
But what if I know myself?
What if I know what I know
And know what I don't know?
What if the world's more duping
Than duped? More deceiving than
Deceived? What if the only true things
Are paradoxes? And the only true things
Are ineffable? But there is an extinguishing
In the blue hour, of a small and isolate thing,
When an ectoplasm struggles to exist or erupt
From the static form formerly filled in and warm.
But no, nothing. Nothing brushed my face, no moth
wing wafted my ear, nothing numinous oozed away.
Fuck death. Fuck death and dying, I'm sick of trying
To care about carelessness. The point's been much made
And death poetry will not be forgiven. But what poetry will
Be forgiven its importunate existence, time and energy eating,
Silk-lipped mouths, still toothy, pap-hungering, all glossolaling.
Excuse me if I'm an anti-edificer here respecting neither fronteirs
Nor roles. I'm not sorry. I've tipped passed the point of pardonable
Eccentricity into po-mo multiplicity, unhinged Zappaism, iconoclastic
Scribbomania, an artificer of worlds unbounded, over eager, word drunk.
I seek to hold and spellbind you and myself with my prosthetic proselytizing
and imperfect cosmos. Ingeminate me. Or spurn me. It's all the same. It's all been
stamped, felt, built, killed. Coding's easier than decoding. Bellies bloat on the immaterial.
I am one of many. We're all in mystery. We refuge in representation's ever order of the day,
Each era is overtaken in the unfathomed advance that berefts bedrock but leaves not nothing,
Perhaps interstitial nets for the networked, intersecting in n-dimensions, dew-sodden and tenuous.
I grant that I take for granted that you take for granted. But perhaps our for-granteds synergize or cancel-out and
We know that we know and we know that what we know is as nothing as everything. Our worlds and words are
Inscribed in level sand and a moth wind wafts. We are voiced and eructating and we may not be one but we are not alone.

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Quatrains

-
Flipping felines yowl
"Copycat me pussy!
With sure celerity
I never fall afoul."

Re-posted here.

-
Kiss-me-quick toes,
Giantess arches,
Gorgonzola veins:
Endless delectations.

Re-posted here.

-
Fight or settle.
For what; what on?
Here I am, Salt Lake.
Move along...wait, stay Mormon.

-
Here I am, dank swamp,
Retrograde river romp.
Here I am in the ether.
I’m an eel in the ether.

-
Here I am, the womb.
I'm a parasite in the womb.
I'm a sybarite in the womb.
Can't keep me down.

-
Manifest destiny's
Logical conclusion's
A Pacific of pilgrims,
But, “We shall build here.”

-
Balustrade autarky,
Inside I'm free.
Percutaneous X,
We inter-annex.

-
Take nothing
Tell no lie
Grow towards the sun
Until you Icarus.

Friday, April 27, 2012

Economics is no physics: Reading List

Before writing, it's instructive to dredge Google to see how many people have, with more wit and expertise, already treated your topic. Blog proliferation means there will be many primaries, secondaries, and nibblers (I fit into this category). Of course, if I wrote only about the unwritten I'd sit on my hands all day. But information about quantity and quality of material may motivate a new publishing strategy.

In that spirit, instead of soap-boxing, here's a non-exhaustive list of resources supporting the obvious premise that economics/finance and physics are substantively different in method and explanatory and predictive success. Most argue that economics is harder than physics and our models of physical systems are better than our models of economic systems.

Of course, doing economics is not necessarily harder than doing physics. Comparing modeling precision between the two is like comparing field goal percentage vs. batting averages and concluding that basketball is harder than baseball. It's not. They're different. They have different measures of difficulty and success. Transposing the sets of working economists and physicists would not lead to an ascendancy of accuracy in the former, but maybe some decline in the latter. Disciplinary constraints disallow massive and rapid change.

Anyway, gadflying does little to reduce the contention that economic systems are, in some ways, more complex than physical ones because they have more intractable uncertainty. We have less epistemic access to system elements and relations. But beyond that, there persist significant differences in methodology: modeling goals, evidence, experimentation. And then there are complications of recursivity and "values." See the resources.

The Spengler (1) and my paper (6) are more about the positive-normative dichotomy in the history of economics, a debate which nonetheless turns on to what degree economics is a science and economists scientists. The Lo and Mueller (2) builds on Frank Knight on types of uncertainty as determinants of modeling precision. Fourcade (4) and Fox (5) provide comments. Black (5) summarizes. Gilboa et al. (7) are methodology-minded economists that formally model economic models as analogous to analogies.

Everybody quotes Richard Feynman (at a Caltech graduation):
“Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings!”
But Joseph J. Spengler preceded him by a long shot.

1 Joseph J. Spengler, "Have Values a Place in Economics" 1934.
However the economist defines economics and its problems...he is dealing with relationships of man to man and of man to natural resources. The physicist, on the contrary, is merely dealing with waves, rays, protons, etc., per se. The geneticist is dealing with chromosomes, genes, etc., per se. Neither is dealing with the manner in which human communities employ rays, waves, genes, etc. The economist, therefore, faces what the physicist and the geneticist do not face, namely, questions impinging upon the value-scales which characterize modern society. For as the late Allyn Young remarked, "Every occurrence in the contemporary life is...a scientific datum, which has to be fitted  into the ordered scheme of social processes. Every such occurrence has its own immediate and concrete significance, and has to be accorded its due weight  in any system of social values...Of social  processes we reserve the right to approve or disapprove."
and later
"To postulate an opinionless economist is to postulate an empirically impossible creature (331)."
2 Andrew Lo and Mark Mueller. 2010 (draft). "Warning: physics envy may be hazardous to your wealth!" simplified in the talk and blog post.
"Physics envy... this desire to explain 99.9% of all economic phenomena with three laws. That's what physicists do. In fact, we [economists] have 99 laws that explain 3% of phenomena." (from the talk)

3 Marion Fourcade (sociology). "Paul Krugman: the wicked economist?"-- short.

4 Justin Fox. "Physicists don't love economists and other revelations." -- short, comic.

5 Dan Black. (power point) "On the intrinsic differences between the physical and social sciences." -- Nice introduction with formal example.

6 Turner, Bradley. 2009. "The economic dichotomy and investigator behavior." -- college essay.

7 Gilboa, et al. at the Penn Institute for Economic Research. "Economic Models as Analogies"
"Indeed, there is no reason that it would be easier to predict stock market crashes than it would be to predict earthquakes. In fact, the opposite is true: because people react to theories, predicting human behavior has theoretical bounds beyond those that are shared by the natural sciences."

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Id for ideas? (no Freud at all)

Do ideas excite you?
Do they drive you
like a bullock whip
Or pull you
Like a magnet?

Are ideas internal
Possessing intrinsic
effervescence, velocity?,
Personal vectors
Of being and doing?

Are they social fodder
For connection
And contestation,
Lubricants of the day to day.
Are we ideational men and women?

Are ideas higher or more
Than other things?
More vital, noble, profound,
Unadulterated or distilled,
Disconnected?

What are ideas anyway?,
If anything at all,
What do they touch?
Where do they fit?
And what are they not?

Ideas are not deities,
(But maybe vice versa),
Nor material or palpable things,
Like viscera
And stock options.

They could be science,
After our knowledge alembic,
But may be more aesthetic,
Like bird's songs,
Possessing singular transience.

Ideas are probably relations,
By virtue of binding,
And almost definitely information,
Bits, that is, guiding
For instance, geese to migration.

Ideas might be
more like instruments than songs
For a role in achieving.
Or perhaps ideals
Infinitely reaching.

But do ideas excite you?
Or does some other thing?
Baser and simpler
Impulses and incentives,
With which we're all familiar.

Money is motivating,
Profane and material.
But without nutrition,
Vacuously instrumental,
For what, for what?

Maybe hedonism helps,
Ideas with directives:
All voluptuous things.
But lamentably tempered
by treadmills and falling returns.

We'd shelter in
Basic needs satisfaction
If it weren't so human
To want more and higher
Forms of gratification.

What then are these more-wanting
and demeaning returns,
If not ideas as natural laws?,
However contingent and uncovering,
Are ideas also governing?

Whatever it is they are or do,
Do ideas excite you?
Are you even excited?
I won't blame you
If you're not.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Quotations: invention, imitation, transposition

Randy Cohen: What is benign in one setting can be toxic in another. (Chainsaws: useful in the forest, dubious at the dinner table. Or as Dr. Johnson put it in a pre-chainsaw age, “A cow is a very good animal in the field; but we turn her out of a garden.”) (*)

Malcolm Gladwell: "I have two parallel things I'm interested in: collecting interesting stories and collecting interesting research. What I'm looking for is where they overlap."

Jean-Luc Godard: It’s not where you take things from—it’s where you take them to.

Jonathan Lethem: Any text is woven entirely with citations, references, echoes, cultural languages, which cut across it through and through in a vast stereophony. The citations that go to make up a text are anonymous, untraceable, and yet already read; they are quotations without inverted commas. The kernel, the soul--let us go further and say the substance, the bulk, the actual and valuable material of all human utterances--is plagiarism. For substantially all ideas are secondhand, consciously and unconsciously drawn from a million outside sources, and daily used by the garnerer with a pride and satisfaction born of the superstition that he originated them; whereas there is not a rag of originality about them anywhere except the little discoloration they get from his mental and moral caliber and his temperament, and which is revealed in characteristics of phrasing. Old and new make the warp and woof of every moment. There is no thread that is not a twist of these two strands. By necessity, by proclivity, and by delight, we all quote. Neurological study has lately shown that memory, imagination, and consciousness itself is stitched, quilted, pastiched. If we cut-and-paste our selves, might we not forgive it of our artworks? "The Ecstasy of Influence" Harper's Magazine, Feb. 2007, p. 68.

Pablo Neruda: "Writers are always interchanging in some way, just as the air we breathe doesn’t belong to one place. The writer is always moving from house to house: he ought to change his furniture. Some writers feel uncomfortable at this. I remember that Federico García Lorca was always asking me to read my lines, my poetry, and yet in the middle of my reading, he would say, “Stop, stop! Don’t go on, lest you influence me!" (Paris Review, The Art of Poetry 14)

Isaac Newton: "If I have seen further it's by standing on ye shoulders of Giants," in a letter to Robert Hooke

John Padgett and Woody Powell: Emergence of novelty is not virgin birth. Everything, even the origin of life itself, is a combination and recombination of other things in its accessible context... Understanding the emergence of objects, therefore, is a matter of deconstructing objects into the transformational flows that construct and sustain them. Viewed from the perspective of flows, objects are the folding and refolding of their context – namely, of the ecology or network of other objects with which those objects interact... For example, stability of the human body through time means not mechanical fixity of parts; it means organic reproduction of parts in flux. Viewed as chemical reactions, we are vortexes in the material life that wends through us all. (*) (forthcoming The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, Princeton U. Press)

Janwillem van de Wetering: The Daimyo : "What would I be? A good question. I have no answer. My mind is clouded by the countless thoughts with which I have identified myself and which have all left their traces." (*) (an interview)

Harrison White: You can be assured that, for each idea, quite a number of substantial, and often independent, discussions and implementations could be cited: Ideas that have any importance, any impact, do, after all, come in company, not as isolates, and the essayist is mostly a transcriber of ideas abroad in his networks" (1994a, p. 4) in Emirbayer 1997

Eric Hoffer: Total innovation is a flight from comparison and also from imitation. Those who discover things for themselves and express them in their own way are not overly bothered by the fact that others have already discovered these things, have even discovered them over and over again and have expressed what they found in all manner of ways. 1960, from his notebooks.

The Books:


Sunday, March 25, 2012

Murakami's A Wild Sheep Chase (spoilers)

"Sometimes I get lonely
Sleeping with you," she said.
"Just great," I said, "Just great."
I was already lost.
She was the kind of girl
That'd sleep with anyone,
I was mediocre,
But OK about it.
It was improbable
That such a person as
Myself could be living,
That such a relation
As ours could last for long.

Another girl, with an
Auricular something,
"You know nothing," she said,
"For sure," I said, "For sure."
On a wild sheep chase,
Ovine totemism,
A vital dynamo,
A fixed point in time space.
Points have no names nor selves,
Suspended over all,
Sheep have both,
A Will, a whip, a host,
Scourging blood for weakness.
"People are weak," I said.
"You don't know this thing," he said,
Gangrene rot worsening,
"That exists in the world."

"Where's the time go?" she asked,
We were close then,
Closer than ever, before the end.
"Time adds up for us," I said,
"But it does not expand,"
No, time does not expand.
Time trails off into death,
Darkness alone shifting,
Like mercury motion,
Voiceless snow falling soft,
Afterward all silent,
Inexpressible cleave.
Getting back to normal,
On a cold, concrete sea,
All alone with the dead,
And ears to hear the waves.

Note: this is "plagiarized" from the text, more of a tessellation of quotes than a novel effort.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Too much text

Michener's Sayonara (spoilers)

Hana-ogi:

Rroyd, Rhroyd,
When you kissed me at Bitchi-bashi,
A good punishing smooch,
I knew you were the tall stud of substance,
I had longed and waited for.

It was but the work of a moment to,
Lay your head in my lap,
Then tumble you by the Shinto shrine.
You felt millions of eyes on you,
But had eyes only for my golden glamour.

You could no more resist carnal thrill,
Than the revelation of whole to whole,
The cohabitation of one in another.
We needed no common tongue to build,
A world away, rapturous, and auto-catalyzing.

But you, you simple and lovable fool,
With your beefhead Broadway blathering,
Dreaming yourself an architect, of setting me free,
Unwilling to forsake your foundation,
Yet demanding it of me.

In the end it was eyes you lacked,
For my, our, the multivocality,
And your own home-love hypocrisy.
Japan was never a place for you,
You were a place for Japan.

And so when your friend blew his brains out,
And mine stuck a knife through her neck,
I went to Tokyo knowing the future.
A succession of small rooms and big stages,
Discipline, promotion, bellicosity,

And an end to love.

Roy Gruver:

Hayano-chan,
Lo the postillion,
Takusan-love for the tadpole on my pillow,
I'm the one's been struck by lightning,
That will never strike again.

Note: First of a series of poems on books I read.

Monday, March 12, 2012

I want clean blood

I want clean blood
Break through the scab
Shine through
Translucent patina
Smog slab
And beneath
An ocean of incarnadine.

Thursday, March 01, 2012

A spoken triplet

You’re a residential nomad,

You bring your house with you,

You’re a hermit crab.

The Books noticed me

Something amazing has probably happened. The refracted light of maybe-greatness has struck me dumb. Here are the details:

I saw a concert by The Books at Cornell Cinema, Ithaca, NY on March 31 2010.

Then I wrote a reflective article (see the previous post) on the experience and The Books artistic process for my radio station's blog at Syracuse, WERW 1570 Word Press, of which I was editor.

I posted the following blurb on The Books' Facebook fan page.
Though heroically unlikely, I'd love if you (The Books, but also anyone else) would read my (pseudo) intellectual piece on your music and show of March 31st at Cornell. Found here.
Yesterday Nick Zammuto or Paul de Jong of the duo The Books or somebody else representing The Books or representing Zammuto's new project read the article and wrote:
Bradley... thats such a bad ass article you wrote man! seriously... one the best i ever saw! good work! Please take some time to check out Nick's new project... the new album comes out April 3rd 2012 under Temporary Residence! hope you enjoy man!
I responded:
This really means a lot to me. It really does. I had a saccharine freak out, flying around the apartment whooping, smiling like enlightenment. And as verbose as my old writing is. And my new writing, come to think of it. Thank you for the attention and the kind words. All best wishes to both of you and best of luck on the new venture. You have my support.
I hope it wasn't mere promotion and that somebody (preferably Zammuto or de Jong) actually read the piece and means what they wrote. It's nice to be recognized, especially by those you admire.

The Books: collectors and collage makers

It was a soggy evening. We were late, but only barely. Our tickets greeted us at the door. Our seats were up a coiling stairway into the bowls of Cornell Cinema, Ithaca, NY. I had gone for a preparatory pee, and let my companions precede me. When I entered the murky second-tier seating, I was ambivalent to discombobulated isolation. Music and video assailed me: The Books in full 2D, 3D, and auditory assault.

The Books are a New York City-based duo, consisting of Nick Zammuto--guitar, vox, bass--and Paul de Jong--cello with great vigor. He broke a string during the performance (and also played bass on one song). Live, they jam over and in sync with their electronic music. Synchronized videos act like pulsing semaphores, conveying independent messages and impressions. The overall effect is stunning and distinctive. For me, the songs and videos bled into one overwhelming and mesmerizing farrago.

The Books are masters of recreation and transformation – what they have deigned to call “auditory mosaic” or “collage music.” They think little of disciplinary or stylistic rigidity, and they are unlikely to be dogmatic about much of anything except originality and quality. They are mixed-media innovators and tinkerers. Zammuto claims to have installed amplifiers in filing cabinets in order to explore metallic resonance. Their art and speech are redolent of eclecticism and artistic postmodernism.

During a Q&A session after the Cornell set, Zammuto mused on the role of language: its inevitable and undeniable power and yet its certain sterility and inherent limitations. It is, he claimed, the best single tool for human communication, but it still can't beat the whole toolbox.

For The Books, language is crucial to song and video composition. However, the words they sing and embed as electronic samples do not primarily explain, predict, or commentate; Zammuto rejected the view of their music as social and political utterance. In this sense, the words they use constitute one of many instruments, used to evoke a range of intellectual and emotional responses – awe, humor, curiosity, etc. And instead of invent, evaluate, and pontificate, The Books collect and they channel.

Zammuto touted de Jong aptitude as a “great collector” of words and not just video. They collect material from thrift stores, even collaborate with other collectors, and mine information from prosaic situations. Their track "Motherless Bastard," they claim, uses real-time video and audio recording from a fast food restaurant.

Be that as it may, language and video in The Books invoke emotion in a way distinct from, say, one of de Jong’s cello solos. Creative force and selectivity guide their composition process. And deciding what to show and not show, how to arrange, distort, and emphasize imply a purpose which is more profound than exhibitionism. There's no escaping artistic intent. And as much as they try to counteract or discount the view, Zammuto and de Jong recognize their role as politicized, social commentators.

The song “Be Good to Them Always,” demonstrates the point. The lyrics are, “I can hear a collective rumbling in America/ I’ve lost my house, you’ve lost your house/ I don’t suppose it matters which way we go/ This great society is going smash.”

Naturally, when I heard this song for the first time in Winter 2008, I assumed it was new – composed and recorded after the big bust. In fact, it is from the album “Lost and Safe,” released in 2005. I then, ahistorically, thought of the lyrics as eerily prescient. But even this view is befuddled. The lyrics are sung in concert with dialogue samples from the-devil-knows-when. Ergo, the samples and thus the song had no intended connection to today’s economic ills. They can't have. And yet, the song is both relevant and timely.

The genius of The Books consists of uniting disparate samples, re-casting them, and embedding them in a new context. Their method would be analogous to that of the antiques collector but for their general agnosticism toward origin. Jean-Luc Godard was supposed to have said it: "It's not where you take things from--It's where you take them to." The Books strive more to create a new and stimulating combinatory artifacts than to comment on the understanding of the past, or present, or future.

Sitting in Cornell Cinema, all senses attuned, I found my brain clouded by thoughts – unfortunate distractions, which interjected themselves between me and the performance. The intellectual and social components kept cropping up, forcing me to translate my experience into language. What did I really think? What was I feeling? What was I going to say to my friends during the unavoidable post-show break-down?

I couldn’t escape these thoughts, and yet I kept reflecting that the kaleidoscopic performance was beyond words; that words were woefully inadequate. I finally abandoned the intellectual exercise, and yielded to the music, the videos, the faces of the performers, the furious pumping of de Jong’s leg keeping beat. I let the full range of emotions overmaster me, and decided that if talk was called for later, I'd recall, ruminate, craft some response.

But when it came time to dissect the show, walking back to the car in the rain, murmurs of wonder and appreciation were forthcoming, but there was surprisingly little to say. The Books had said it all for us.

-Brad Turner, of Brad and the Unbounded One, Wednesdays 9-11pm on WERW
Originally 3 April 2012, WERE Blog

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Sh*t, the cops! Run! (an econ abstract)

"The phenomenon of group-escape cannot be explained by an argument of risk dilution, applied to gregarious behaviour of passive prey whose risk of predation is equally shared by all group members [17]. Instead, individuals at the tail of an escaping group suffer the bulk of the group’s predation risk, and thus have the highest incentive to desert it. Just because of this, desertion, in this case, may serve as a signal of vulnerability for the pursuing predator. Under wide conditions it is therefore shown that the predator is always expected to prefer the chasing of a deserter, whenever it is observed. Consequently, an individual who finds himself at the tail of the herd must compare the risk of remaining there, with that of deserting the herd and thereby becoming a likely target for predation. If the first risk is higher than the latter, the herd disperses; if the latter is higher, the herd cohesively follows the fastest individuals in its lead (we deal also with cases in which only part of the herd disperses). We see, however, that the question which risk is higher, depends on the terrain, but also on the route of escape that is decided by the fastest members at the lead of the herd, those that are least likely to be caught. Concentrating on herds without family structure, we assume that the route of escape is selfishly chosen by these ad hoc leaders to minimize their own predation risk, regardless of the others’ welfare. However, the predation risk of the leader depends very much on the willingness of other herd members to follow him, thus providing a buffer between him and the pursuing predator. Consequently, when choosing an escape route, the leader has also to consider the cohesion of the herd, i.e. the reaction of slower individuals to his choice. Under some plausible conditions, this choice may force the herd to follow, while other conditions may lead to its dispersal. In some cases the leader may choose a route that serves the needs of the entire group, and sometime only its more vulnerable members. In other cases the leader may choose a route that sacrifices the weakest members, thereby improving the survival probability of the others.
We employ a model of a k + 1 players game, a single predator and k heterogeneous prey individuals. The predator aims to maximize the probability of a successful catch, and each individual aims to minimize his probability of being caught."

From Eshel, Ilan, Emilia Sansone, and Avner Shaked. 2011. "On the Evolution of Group-Escape Strategies of Selfish Prey." Theoretical Population Biology. Vol. 80 (2), 150-157 (Elsevier).

Note: To be fair, this is as much a biology or applied mathematics paper as an economics paper, but that doesn't make it any less awesome.

Friday, February 17, 2012

Inflect the banal

Inflect the banal.
Inflect it with tinges of color, corruption, doubt, impossibility, magic, mystery.
Capture the conservatives and the dreamers,
Seduce them with the almost-imperceptible,
Tangent to the known and knowable,
The distorted prosaic.

Inflect the banal,
But don't over-do it,
Don't spew florid particulars,
Don't bask in wonderment,
Don't succumb to bombast,
Don't asphyxiate with love.

Inflect the banal,
Tickle the imagination,
Kiss it lightly,
Slither a razor blade over it,
Reserve the cat o’ nine tails,
For special occasions.

Re-posted here.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

The fallacy of the unbounded

Allow me to take a stroll down memory lane.

Originally, "The Unbounded One" was a radio show and personality: my show, my personality on WERW 1570 AM and Internet Radio and later WAER 88.3 FM, Syracuse, and WHPK 88.5, Chicago.

I invented the moniker and intended it from the first to have a double significance, to refer to me, given my dedication to world music, and also to the immanent one, the totality of the world itself.

Immanence is a concept referring to presence manifested within, contained within, and intermingling with. In philosophy a mental act is immanent if it stays within the mind; if it passes through the mental barrier to make an external effect, it is transeunt. In religion, the deity is immanent, as opposed to transcendent, if it is indwelling in the universe, time, life, etc.

So the show featured two Unbounded Ones fused into one: me and a global omnium gatherum, each inherent to the limitless and immanent world.

A most perfect and mysterious thing to which I assign considerable credence seems to be the entire universe. A most unperfect and not-too mysterious thing is the human being. How to make the human being more like the universe without spreading its substance thin across the void?

As far as we know - which may not be very far - everything is constrained. Except for figments: infinity, utopia, the deity, the ideal, perhaps the imagination. If perfection is somewhere manifested, its form and substance are beyond human apprehension.

So neither I nor the world are limitless, unboundedness is a fallacy and a trap, and the term is subject to criticism. At least in principle, it's wrong, deceptive, disingenuous, dangerous. How might the fallacy of the unbounded cause trouble?

Dr. Johnson put it nicely: "A man may be so much of everything that he is nothing of anything." One may eternally dabble, be a career itinerant, a multi-pronged and many-purposed dilettante, an impotent jack of a trades, an under-realized, half-cocked, lost lemming loser (to be polemical about it).

More specifically, if it is the case that constraints are unconstrained, if they are everywhere, there's an acute danger of over-exertion. The results can be imagined: strain, cognitive dissonance, and failure, and then--this is where things really sour--in response to failure, instead of focus and dedication and obliteration of obstacles, a dodge or re-orientation.

An objection to this uncorroborated trail of thought might be as follows: Who's really to tell the difference between over-extension and well-rounded Renaissance?

Zuckerman et al. call these two sides of the same coin "robust identity" and "non-entity" in their study of type casting in the feature film labor market" (2003). They hold that professional lives should be shaped like trees: straight and narrow and streamlined at the bottom or sapling stage, with abundant, dappled foliage appearing at the top or maturation stage.

Narrowness, focus, and simplicity helps then hinders; breadth, complexity, multivalence of identity hinders then helps. In short, bind and then unbind. It is striking that one of their main claims is that in many labor markets "boundarylessenss" may be a significant liability.

This post is as biographical and conceptual footnote in the fabrication of a fictional world: The Unbounded Microverse. But the implications run and strike deeply. Insofar as all striving (ambitious) individuals strategize, they do so by answering the following questions: what constraints, how constrained, and what to do about it?

Quotations: action, production

Note: Many of these are from the website of Elisabeth Fosslien. Look for a justification of this move later.

Kingsley Amis: For once in his life, Dixon resolved to bet on his luck. What luck had come his way in the past he'd distrusted, stingily held on to until the chance of losing his initial gain was safely past. It was time to stop doing that *.

Mawi Asgedom: Like any dream, you have to start believing that you can do it. You don't quite know how it will turn out but you start anyway. Discipline is your best friend. If you have the discipline to write two pages every day, after 150 days, you have 300 pages. I actually use this in my speeches to show students how important discipline is. Something small, writing two pages, if done repeatedly can become something big, a 300-page book. That's my motto for success: dream big, do small, every day.

Saul Bellow: what he preached at me...the thing to do: not to dissolve in bewilderment of choices but to make myself hard, like himself, and learn how to stay with the necessary, undistracted by the trimmings *... A description: wild internal disorder, or even with the fact that he was quivering. And why? Because he let the entire world press upon him. For instance? Well, for instance, what it means to be a man. In a city. In a century. In transition. In a mass. Transformed by science. Under organized power. Subject to tremendous controls. In a condition caused by mechanization. After the late failure of radical hopes. Owing to the multiplied power of numbers which made the self negligible... At the same time, the pressure of human millions who have discovered what concerted efforts and thoughts can do. As megatons of water shape organisms on the ocean floor. As tides polish stones. As winds hollow cliffs. The beautiful supermachinery opening a new life for innumerable mankind. Would you deny them the right to exist? Would you ask them to labor and go hungry while you enjoyed delicious old-fashioned values? You - you yourself are a child of the mass and a brother to all the rest. Or else an ingrate, dilettante, idiot. There, Herzog, thought Herzog, since you ask for the instance, is the way it runs. On top of that, an injured heart, and raw gasoline poured on the nerves... The busy bee has no time for sorrow *.

Samuel Clemens: Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than the ones you did do... so throw off the bowlines, sail away from the safe harbor, catch the trade winds in your sails... explore, dream, discover.

Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.

Seth Godin: Comments and Twitter are like a Fresnel lens. You can use them to focus attention if you’re very disciplined and very good, or, if you’re like me, you’ll end up finding your energy and attention diffused into a maelstrom, lost to the winds of inanity, anger or trivia. * The first thing you do when you sit down at the computer: Let me guess: check the incoming. Check email or traffic stats or messages from your boss. Check the tweets you follow or the FB status of friends. You've just surrendered not only a block of time but your freshest, best chance to start something new...the first thing you do should be to lay tracks to accomplish your goals, not to hear how others have reacted/responded/insisted to what happened yesterday * .

Samuel Huntington: Some people may say that people in glass houses should not throw stones... I do not mind performing a useful function by throwing stones and thus encouraging others to move out of their glass houses, once I have moved out of mine (jstor p. 304).

Rudyard Kipling: [Lurgan Sahib] 'By doing it many times over till it is done perfectly--for it is worth doing' *.

Somerset Maugham: In my heart was a desire to live more dangerously. I was not unprepared for jagged rocks and treacherous shoals if I could only have change -- change and the excitement of the unforeseen (*).

Haruki Murakami: [Colonel Sanders] "We're talking about a revelation here...a revelation leaps over the borders of the everyday. A life without revelation is no life at all. What you need to do is move from reason that observes to reason that acts. That's what's critical" (255)...

[Kafka] "But I've always tried to get stronger."
"That's very important," the brawny one says, "Very important--to do your best to get stronger" (386).

Janwillem van de Wetering: Good luck comes to those who keep trying.

Ad astra.

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Marcel Weber's inference to the best explanation

Source: Weber, Marcel. "The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Duhem's Problems and Inference to the Best Explanation." Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 60, 19-49

Pierre Duhem is famous for his severe philosophical criticism of severe testing, or crucial experimentation, in science. A crucial experiment would follow a form of eliminative induction as follows.

Starting with alternate hypotheses of an evidenced phenomena, an experiment could negate one or all but one by showing contradiction with the evidence. This constitutes modus tollens or denying the consequent of the form “If h1, then e. Not e. Therefore, not h1.” If e follows from h2, then by disjunctive syllogism we can conclude the veracity of h2, or the last hypothesis standing.

Such a train of inference from experimentation is admissible according to logic, but it faces two difficulties in practice.

First, hypotheses are not singular postulates but conjunctive bundles. They rely on auxiliary hypotheses which rely on auxiliary hypotheses which rely on auxiliary hypotheses and so on... This is called the problem of untested auxiliaries.

Eliminative induction fails because humans cannot pinpoint error; they cannot grab the tip of the devil’s tail.

Second, while we can purport to parse the full field of contenders in logic or mathematics, we cannot do so in physics or economics. According to Duhem, “Shall we ever dare to assert that no other hypothesis is imaginable?”

The answer, of course, is no. But Duhem’s dire turn of phrase should not deter us from saying, "Big deal," and forging on with science uncowed. We might accept a pragmatic constraint on science as necessitating or justifying a means of distinguishing between theories, because the alternative, anarchy, is unacceptable.

Said differently, Duhem’s epistemic standards are too high: imaginability is not a useful criterion with which to judge science.

The conventional answer as I have phrased it is pick the best hypothesis, call it theory, and move on. This is called inference to the best explanation and it is the line taken by Marcel Weber.

The conventional rejoinder comes as a finer distillation of the Duhem critique. This is Bas van Fraassen’s “bad lot”-argument: if all the choices are crappy, even the least crappy is still crappy. Well, crap.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Muscles and entrails

If practice makes perfect,
And practiced practices are habits,
Then perfected habits are practiced.

If mastication speeds assimilation,
And indigestion is somatic sedition,
Then unseed sedition with ration.

If excessive excess is infinite infinity,
And excessive moderation is infinite finity,
Then moderate excess leads to the palace of wisdom.

If the early bird catches the worm,
And the late bird captures the moth,
The booby goes to the sloth.

If phraseology is phenotypic,
And the corporeal forms assimilate infinity,
Then the emperor's clothes are immaterial.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Notes from "American Parsifal"

"American Parsifal" is a class at Syracuse University taught by Andrew Waggoner, composer in residence and violinist. I took it in Fall 2009. The class appraises trends in the tug of war between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism in America. Besides Waggoner's riffs on history and culture, we consumed and chewed on a lot of art: poetry (Walt Whitman, Elizabeth Bishop), music (Charles Ives, Elliot Carter, early Rock and Roll, Jazz), film (Forrest Gump, Being There, Bamboozled), and essays (Louis Menand, Toni Morrison). I was pupil qua amanuensis for the course, typing away on my petite laptop to sop up the wit and wisdom for posterity. What follows are notable transcriptions and interpretations from my notes.
  • "I dream up goofy, fun stuff to study.", "The history was written by men; it's really quite simple.", "I can teach any damn fool thing I want."
  • Semiotics was like influenza - the US strain went to Europe, mixed with the French, became virile and nasty, and returned to the US to wreak havoc.
  • Science as metaphor. Fundamental mistake: metaphors are not equal.
  • "Public education in this country has been an absolute disaster for the past 50 years."
  • Bush: America is falling behind in Math and Science--the same administration which had been openly aggressive and violent towards science.
  • I do not want intellectual labor saving devices. The way to avoid doing that that musically is to listen to intellectually engaging, difficult music--jazz.
  • "The Soviet Union was an anthill run by psychopaths."
  • "The right is an easy target:" Bill O'Reily, Sean Hannity - bit players - "these are visibly stupid people."
  • Three options when talking about blackness, Africanism, and other controversial phenomena:
    1. Talk about it in ultra-respectful, politically correct language with a sense of modesty and seriousness.
    2. Just talk about it.
    3. Do not talk about it at all.
    (we chose door #2 in class)
  • "He wanted me to fight him, he wanted me to see him with all of his imperfections, he did not want me to turn him into something I needed; into a kind of black Dalai Lama."
  • Going to a hip-hop show is a unique, black experience whites should get involved in; more black people should go to the symphony.
  • There is no American music without black music, yet black music is over and over again characterized as a kind of dark, jungle music--corrosive, mad, rhythmic--capable of turning people insane or corrupting their brain with excessive, orgiastic experience.
  • Forrest Gump: The film springs from the American mythos that "The truest, most authentic, and most valuable aspect of the American psyche, the American soul, is to act with innocence and out of a pure desire to remain impervious to the distractions, the temptations, the sense of chaos, all the things, in other words, that constitute humanity."
    • In correspondence about this blog post: "I like the Forrest Gump quote, but maybe you could set it up so that it's clear that I hate the movie"  
  • "So you can put that under your hats."

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Rant of an ulkomaalainen (foreigner)

Brad: What am I up to tonight? Well, I'm hitting the Finnish again...

Brad: You're what!? What tomfoolery is this!? Why play Sisyphus?

Brad:
My dear one, you can and should be a Debbie Downer if you want to be--you have logic, the majority opinion, and inertia on your side. And me? Behind me are assembled 5.4 million snowpeople (including Santa Clause, trolls, and various humanoids), some 200,000 reindeer, and 187,888 lakes. But, alas, I am not equipped with rejoinders. I shelter behind the vintaged commandments: respect people and country, avail oneself of the uniqueness, when in Roma and whatnot.

Brad: Kind sir, I see. Perfectly reasonable! I respect your respect for the Finns. Those sweaty nudists, reveling in the phantasmagoria of the northern lights, drinking the drink, and skiing the freaky fluke of Europe. Why not go native?

Brad: Assuredly, yes, a staid people with eccentric habits. I'm keen to join the club, but even they discourage learning their hairy tongue.

Brad: Haha, hairy?

Brad: Dotted, you know, not bald, but covered by a spotty turf, a prickly rug. For instance, "Miten täällä on yht'äkkiä näin vitun suuri määrä ihmisiä?" The question is this: Am I, AbelarBrad, bold enough to hug the bizarre to the bosom, to subject myself to an obscure and thankless toil? What kind of insane person wouldn't? Balls to sanity, normality, nationalism, conformity, pragmatic or instrumental logic, cost-benefit analysis, inference-to-the-best-explanation, optimization, conventional wisdom, the profit motive. Balls to the whole kit and kaboodle. Balls to Mitt Romney. I'm taking lines from the illogicians. Now is the time to suck the shock elements up the nostrils to discordianize the chains of command in the brain, the 'mind-forg'd manacles' that Blake wrote about. A friend I met this weekend said it best, "Hay que aprovechar chingada mierda, hay que aprovechar" (OK, I added the green language). Cachai? Moreover, what's a greater despoil of time: to dedicate oneself to a moribund language without hope of using it let alone becoming its master, or, given just one chance in a lifetime, failing to affix the lips to the cultural fire hose? And what is culture anyway? Bingo!, you guessed it, it starts with "lang" and ends with "uage"! It's not enough to ski and sauna to my heart's content, I need the langue and parole, I need Finnish.
So that's my rant for the day.

Brad: All hail the sultan of Finnophilia, ye squanderer of resources, cultural omnivore, engrossed in the fallacy of the unbounded, cosmopole lost in orbit. Get a real job, you eternally adolescent hipster day-tripper, you millenial, and then come talk to me--in English, if you please, the language of the ungraspable past devouring the future, the language of the always.